But then I realized GBB/VBR is also linked to several movement types (i.e. 261-201-221....), so, following my indications, every time I used one of them, for direct procurement materials I had a fiscal cost! This is a big problem!!
So I thought to shift every movement type associated to GBB/VBR to GBB/EIN, cause I saw the latter was not linked to any movement type. In this way, I solved the overlapping problem between Planning and Warehouse movements.
Do you think it could be a right solution, or should I have other problems I did not evaluate? - crazzauti
GBB/EIN should not be maintained as we already have a Transaction key named as EIN - Purchase account.
Goto Transaction OBYC and you can see that there.
Coming to Z01 - you can maintain this only with reference to GBB.
In the Confguration of account grouping for movemnt types, you can see the settings
201 P WA03 2 GBB VBR
201 K WA03 2 GBB VBR
Instead of maintaining VBR, maintain a new Account modifier as Z01, this will solve your issue.
But remember you are changing the settings for standard movemnt types that is not advisable, so you can copy the standard creat anew and perform the changes. - Kishore
EIN - is used for Purchase account management and this should not be used as an offsetting transaction key. If you need to post in different transactions you can change the offsetting entry in the Movement types being used. Create a offsetting entry account modifier as Z01 and use that for your purpose. the offsetting transaction can be directly created in the movement type its self.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.